Sir Ken Robinson and Pasi Sahlberg have two different
ideas when it comes to education reform. Sir Robinson’s argument is that we are
still trying to approach education just like we did in the past however, according
to him we shouldn’t be doing that we should be approaching it in a way to
better suit the students of the present day. On the other side of the argument we
have Pasi Sahlberg. He argues that America focuses more on competition and
payment rather than focusing on the individual as well as equity and equality.
The conversation between the two would possibly be one of the most heated
arguments between education reform. Sir Robinson values the way the education
system is setup whereas Sahlberg’s suggestion is to focus more on the
individual student. The argument would rise out of the fact that Sahlberg wants
America to completely overhaul its way of education yet Sir Robinson only
focuses on the way it operates and how students should be organized. They both
want education reform. How they both want it are entirely different from each
other in their own respective ways.
I agree that they have two different ways of approaching this topic. They both have strong points and I believe both ways can be successful. Their own personal style, along with their views/beliefs are different. I also agree that they both want education reform. In Sir Ken Robinson's video he also mentions ADHD and how it isn't what people are making it out to be. He obviously doesn't believe it is a real issue due to how it is coming off. Another thing I agree with is how Sir Ken talks about education as a whole where Sahlberg is specifically talking about individuals.
ReplyDelete